Questionário

Showing posts with label communist state capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communist state capitalism. Show all posts

Monday, 1 December 2014

Communist state capitalism in China

China currently lives under a complex mishmash of the leftovers of communism, state capitalism, crony capitalism and laissez faire in the special economic zones. The communist party remains in power, but has progressively replaced the communist ideology by a mix of nationalism and mercantilism.

This new model has been very successful in terms of economic growth and attraction of foreign direct investment. Due to its huge population (1/4 of all humanity), China is now seen as a kind of manufacturing factory for the world.

Under Deng Xiaoping, China introduced in 1979 a policy to modernize their state owned companies by granting them more decision making power and the possibility of retaining a share of the profits. Along with this, marginal players operating outside the boundary of socialism were tolerated as long as they did not threaten the state sector or challenge the Party’s political power. The later spur a movement of entrepreneurial activity through private farming, township and village enterprises, private business in cities, and Special Economic Zones.

Three years after the Tiananmen Square Massacre the Communist Party officially endorsed the “socialist market economy” in 1992. This was followed from 1992 to 1994 by a second round of reforms aimed at creating a true internal market within China by abolishing or reducing the many trade and tax barriers at provincial borders and through the privatization of some state enterprises.

Two other important milestones were the membership of the World Trade Organization in 2001 and the constitutional amendment of 2004 recognizing the protection of private property.

The most radical departure from communism was the 1980 establishment of Special Economic Zones in Zhuhai, Xiamen, Shenzhen, and Shantou opened to foreign investment to experiment with the market economy, import advanced technology and managerial know-how, and sell goods to the global markets without undermining socialism in the rest of the country.

These were later extended to other regions and transformed China from a backward rural economy into the largest offshore processing center of the world. These areas attracted 70% of all foreign investment and contributed to over 70% of its exports. Foreign direct investment (FDI), including from Chinese living abroad, became the driver of an unprecedented export-led boom.
Source: UNCTAD World Investment Report 2014

There are two remarkable features in the evolution of FDI in China. Its ten-fold increase during the 1990-1994 second round of reforms that followed Tiananmen and the fact that since 2005 China also became a major source of FDI. Most of the Chinese outward investment went to Hong Kong and offshore centers but the Chinese have also invested significantly in Australia, South Africa and other African countries rich in natural resources.

These flows are an unquestionable testimony and consequence of the success of China’s mercantilist dualist economy – a state owned economy supported by the largest offshore territory in the world. Indeed, in 2006 its foreign currency reserves, already the world's biggest, topped $1 trillion. They are also the best proof of the power of capitalism as an economic system, even in its distorted version of state capitalism.

The question is to know whether it can survive in its current form and how it may evolve. Judging from previous experiences it is unlikely that the current model will last more than 30-40 years.

For instance, despite the initial economic role of the Chinese military complex and a rising nationalism one hopes that it will not derive into a Nazi/Japanese-like military adventure that would kill its early success and endanger world peace.

Similarly, any drive to obstruct the growth of joint stock companies while transforming the still large and inefficient state enterprises into some form of Tito’s Yugoslav model of self-managed enterprises is equally doomed to fail.

An evolution towards a Scandinavian model of state capitalism would be equally short-lived and does not seem feasible given the cultural differences between the Nordics and the Chinese. Likewise with a move towards a Mediterranean corporatist form.

The Chinese state capitalism is already showing signs of fatigue. As usual, these are more visible in disastrous investments abroad and in a fragile banking system. The latter is a time-bomb in waiting. Some, like C. E. Walter and J.T.H. Fraser (2009), alerted to how the banks are risking the retirement of an ageing population of more than 300 million people. The “heroic savings capacity of the Chinese people” are being used to finance loss making state companies as well as property bubbles and gigantic “Pharaonic” infrastructure investments.

Despite these worrisome signs, the Chinese people have embraced a commitment to education and learning from the Western countries experience without parallel in history. For instance, in the academic year 2010-2011 there were about 340 thousand students studying abroad, most of them financed by their own families. Indeed, in the USA and the UK there are now Universities that survive on Chinese students. These students are very competitive and will foster a new rise in entrepreneurship and modernization as long as their drive to succeed is not diverted towards nationalistic adventures.

Indeed, contrary to what some claim, I do not believe that the peaceful transition from communist state capitalism towards a democratic market capitalism needs a new “third way”. I totally disagree with the Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase predicament that: “Capitalism will be much more robust if it’s not a monopoly of the West, but flourishes in societies with different cultures, religions, histories, and political systems.”

It is not possible to achieve true market capitalism within a communist political system. However, the two transition processes can reinforce each other rather than deter one another.

By correcting the many deficiencies in the Chinese pillars of capitalism, from relying less in joint ventures and better protecting private property to the abolishment of internal restrictions to labor mobility and the opening up of its domestic financial market to achieve international capital mobility on both current and capital transactions, China would ease its political transition towards representative democracy and constitutional liberalism. For instance, a strong adherence to a system of limited liability will enforce credit prudence in the banking sector and might avoid the foreseeable problems with old age pensions.

In conclusion, China is at a crossroad. If she wants to preserve its recent economic success and avoid descending into other forms of state capitalism or to become a crony capitalist system of the Russian type it must fully embrace market capitalism. The more it does so the greater the chances of also managing a peaceful political transition.

Saturday, 14 January 2012

Mob Management Style in Communist State Capitalism

The success of dictatorial forms of state capitalism often depends on the adoption of a mob management style.

As is well known, the various Mafia families run both legitimate and criminal activities. Often, what is not realized is that successful mafia bosses learned that they could not run the two types of business in the same way. When taking over lawful businesses they leave in charge the previous managers or employ new professional mangers (often reputable citizens) but appoint a minder to remind such managers that they cannot step out of line. The minder may be a deputy, a security guard or even a driver but the manager cannot doubt that he is the eyes and ears of the boss. This way, the mafia boss avoids turning his criminal associates into lousy managers that would ruin his business while preserving their loyalty by giving them limited power and rewards.

Maverick dictators like Hitler used the same management approach. He used his rogue bunch of SS criminals to instill fear among top civil servants but left intact the efficient German army and government bureaucracy, including the famous financier Hjalmar Schacht as president of the Reichsbank.

In the early 1990s, I personally observed the same policy being pursued by Kazakhstan’s communist-era leader and for-life President, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Before independence, the Kazakhs were predominantly poor and uneducated and the Russians dominated the entire government administration. Instead of packing them back to Moscow, he maintained their positions and privileges if they accepted the tutelage of his handpicked ethnic Kazakhs.

More recently, after the Chinese took over Macau from Portugal I observed the same policy in action. While the Chinese swiftly erased many of the Portuguese symbols in the territory, they kept most of the Portuguese running its administration. They simply appointed a party member from mainland China to monitor them, often despite the resentment among local ethnic Chinese.

Although this mob style of management can be successful in the short run, as it was in the early days of Nazi Germany and as it is now in China, I do not believe that it will be sustainable.

Its failure will happen not because the Mafia’s boss family or the Party Nomenklatura are prone to end up fighting over power (although this often happens), but because of a fundamental flaw of the mob management style.

Lasting management success requires three distinct qualities – investment acumen, business savvy and leadership.

While the mob management style guarantees leadership and may substitute business shrewdness by corruption, robbery or outright threat it can never achieve investment wisdom. It cannot provide the vision and flexibility necessary to anticipate opportunities and allocate capital efficiently. On the contrary, it will inevitably overspend in low return projects aimed at rewarding political clienteles or at securing the bosses’ own glorification and security apparatus.

Therefore, despite its recent success, we believe that communist state capitalism in China is doomed to fail. Unless, of course, the Chinese reverse their ways and move towards market capitalism and democracy.